Professionelle Identität: DDS und Technikfolgenabschätzung (SE)

Back
Specialization AreaDisability, Diversity and Technologie
Course numberB3.07290.05.550
Course codePI a
Curriculum2018
Semester of degree program Semester 5
Mode of delivery Presencecourse
SPPW2,0
ECTS credits3,0
Language of instruction German

The graduates know the basics in the theories of technology (ethics of technology, issues in technology genesis and technology implementation) which concern the concept of technology as a central medium for the forms of social communication and the human interpretation of the self and the world.

The basics of ethical and philosophical competence in the area of technology ethics are gained in a normative manner. This access of social-philosophical-political issues is discussed in regard to bioethics as "trans-sectoral technology ethics" (fallacy).

In particular, the graduates gain an understanding of the challenges of dealing with new options of action in high tech medicine. They are able to recognize, to analyse and to assess (bio)ethical problems in the development of new technologies. They understand the approaches and the evaluation of technological development in respect to the priorities of people with disabilities.

In case of technological development the students are aware of accessibility and the possibilities of "design for all".

The students are introduced to the interface of medical technologies in "AAL" developments (ambient assisted living) and know about research findings for the needs analysis, their usability and their acceptance as a basis of integral "AAL" evaluation strategies.

The knowledge is furthermore used to reflect upon their professional identity.

Basic dimensions and functions of the profession and professionalism (professionalisation theories) are discussed in this lecture as well as the formation of a professional identity in the course of DDS. Students are informed, that DDS on the one hand are based on scientific research, but on the other hand also offer new professional fields of action, which connect the varied and rapid developments of technology (as for example consultation in biomedical decision situations, consultation in issues of freedom of barriers as well as consultants, socio-scientific experts in participative development processes of technology). Particularly important is the creation of a professional identity in DDS and technology.

Dederich, M. (Hrsg.) (2004): Bioethik und Behinderung. Bad Heilbrunn.

Dungs, S.; Mührel, E.; Gerber, U. (Hrsg.) (2009): Biotechnologie in Kontexten der Sozial- und Gesundheitsberufe: Professionelle Praxen - Disziplinäre Nachbarschaften - Gesellschaftliche Leitbilder. Frankfurt am
Main.

Eilers, M.; Rehmann-Sutter, Chr.; Grüber, K. (Hrsg.) (2012): Verbesserte Körper - gutes Leben?: Bioethik, Enhancement und die Disability Studies. Frankfurt am Main.

Gamm, G. (2000): Nicht nichts. Studien zu einer Semantik des Unbestimmten. Frankfurt am Main.

Heilinger, J.-Chr. (2010): Anthropologie und Ethik des Enhancements. Berlin/New York.

Hellbusch, J.-E.; Probiesch, K. (2011): Barrierefreiheit verstehen und umsetzen: Webstandards für ein zugängliches und nutzbares Internet. Heidelberg.

Herwig, O. (2008): Universal Design: Lösungen für einen barrierefreien Alltag. Basel.

Heylighen, A. (2008): Sustainable and inclusive design: a matter of knowledge? In: Local Environment, 13(6), S. 531 - 540.

Holfeld, M. (2012): Barrierefreie Lebensräume: Bauen und Wohnen ohne Hindernisse. Berlin.

Hubig, Chr. (2006/07): Die Kunst des Möglichen, Band I und II. Bielefeld.

Irrgang, B. (2005): Einführung in die Bioethik. München.

Kind, Chr.; Braga, S.; Studer, A. (Hrsg.) (2010): Auswählen oder annehmen? Pränatal- und Präimplantationsdiagnostik. Zürich.

Kohlbecker, G. (2011): Barrierefreiheit im Bestand. Stuttgart.

Lenk, H.; Ropohl, G. (Hrsg.) (1993): Technik und Ethik. Stuttgart.

Meyer, S.; Mollenkopf, H. (Hrsg.) (2010): AAL in der alternden Gesellschaft -Anforderungen, Akzeptanz und Perspektiven, Analyse und Planungshilfe.

Nordmann, A. (2008): Technikphilosophie zur Einführung. Hamburg.

Panek, P., et al. (2008): The Living Lab in Schwechat for Involving Older Persons in the Innovation Process of Assisted Living Technologies. Vortrag: Real Corp 008, Vienna, 19.05.2008 - 21.05.2008. In: Proceedings of the REAL CORP 008. Vienna. S. 665-669.

Preiser, W.F.E.; Ostroff, E. (Hrsg.) (2001): Universal Design Hand-book. McGraw-Hill, New York.

Rauhala, M.; Edelmayer, G.; Topo, P.; Zagler, W.L. (2007): Ethics and Assistive Technology Development - Project Workers' Experiences with Continuous Ethical Review. Vortrag: AAATE 07 9th European Conference for the Advancement of Assistive Technology in Europe, San Sebastian, Spain; 03.10.2007 - 05.10.2007. In: Challenges for Assistive Technology, proc of the 9th Europ Conf for the Advancement of Assistive Technology in Europe (AAATE), IOS Press, Volume 20. S. 610-614.

The Center for Universal Design (1997): The Principles of Universal Design, Version 2.0. North Carolina State University, NC.

Weyer, J. (2008): Techniksoziologie. Genese, Gestaltung und Steuerung soziotechnischer Systeme. Weinheim.

Zagler, W.L. (2012): "Rehabilitationstechnik - Assistive Technologie"; In: V. Fialka-Moser (Hrsg.): Kompendium Physikalische Medizin und Rehabilitation. Wien, New York. S. 245-258.

Zagler, W.L.; Panek, P. (2009): Die ersten und letzten Worte haben die Anwender und Anwenderinnen - Beispiele für partizipatives Design bei AAL Produktentwicklung. Vortrag: 2. Deutscher AAL-Kongress in Berlin, 27.01.2009 - 28.01.2009. In: Tagungsband zum 2. Deutscher AAL-Kongress. Berlin.

Zoglauer, Th. (Hrsg.) (2002): Technikphilosophie. Freiburg.

LV-immanenter Prüfungscharakter